STUDENTS
AND SCIENTISTS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INTERN PROGRAM

|
2008 Participants: Shirou
Wu, Emily Lopes, Zach Rotter)
|
Accolades to our three utstanding High School students,
Emily Lopes of Commack H.S.; Zach Rotter of Walt Whitman H.S.; and
Shirou Wu of Commack H.S. who dedicated a month this summer to conduct
scientific research at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia,
under the tutelage of Drs. Jose and Irma Russo. These bright, emerging
young scientists participated in extensive research deriving deeply
into better understanding environmental triggers which create abnormalities
in breast tissue. Uniquely, this laboratory experience afforded
our students the opportunity to play an active role in analyzing
tissue samples, creating hypotheses, and clearly presenting their
scientifically based conclusions before a team of world renowned
scientists, in an attempt to unravel the mysteries surrounding the
causation of disease. Below are some thoughts that the students
would like to share.
Emily Lopes
Through the Students and Scientist Environmental Research Scholarship
Program sponsored by Huntington Breast Cancer Action Coalition,
this past summer I was given the opportunity to work at the Breast
Cancer Lab at Fox Chase Cancer Center. This internship was a chance
to be thrown full throttle into the war against breast cancer from
the research battle front. From day one, my fellow interns and I
became part of the lab and were given the opportunity to learn from
leading researchers in the field. A defining moment that set the
pace occurred on the very first day when we learned how to sacrifice
a rat and dissect various parts for the purposes of conducting research.
That moment made the researching experience real, we were part of
the research process. There were high standards that we were expected
to uphold while conducting research, but I never felt overwhelmed
or lost because I could always turn to anyone in the lab and ask
for help. The experience of being in Philadelphia for the internship
was not limited to being in the lab. For my month long stay I lived
with the Sheriff family, who were very hospitable, making me feel
right at home. Dr. Sheriff, also one of the scientists at the Breast
Cancer Lab, offered support and was a person that I could turn to
in and out of the lab setting.
In the first week of being there, I learned about the structures
of the mammary gland, how to stain the tissue and became well versed
in the terminology. When Shirou, Zach and I, split up to study our
assigned compounds, I was excited to be assigned BBP because it
gave me a chance to research a compound that I had background experience
studying. While we were expected to complete our research within
a set time frame, I never felt rushed. I felt that all deadlines
were reasonable with time allotted to really think through the research
and analyze our findings. This relaxed pace that was established
within the lab truly lent itself to contemplating various avenues
of research and thinking of ways to reevaluate procedures. Tea time
reflected this mentality. It was a period of 15 minutes set aside
at the end of everyday where one could go down to the cafeteria
and socialize with renowned scientists and doctors working at the
lab.
The culmination of the experience was being able to present my research
on the final day of the internship in front of the head of the lab,
Dr. Russo, the scientists of the Breast Cancer Lab, and parents.
We each gave a 20 minute presentation in which we were able to highlight
the links to breast cancer that we found after analyzing the mammary
glands of the rats both structurally and genetically. This presentation
was not nerve-racking because I felt that my time at the lab had
well prepared me for the questioning session that followed each
presentation. I am so thankful that I was given the opportunity
to work with the Russo's and gain valuable experience conducting
research. I know that I will not only share with my school and community
my new found knowledge, but also take it with me for the rest of
my life.
Shirou Wu
In past few decades, public focus in researching environmental
triggers of various diseases has increased dramatically. Although
our society is still primarily concerned with treatments, the understanding
of the causes of disease, and subsequently doing as much as possible
to avert the activation these sources of illness have gradually
become just as much of a focus in scientific research as developing
cures. This fundamental principle of medicine, known as “prevention”,
underlies the basic philosophy of environmental research.
Around 90% of all breast cancer cases are reported without known
family history. This illustrates a very important concept. While
the genetic predisposition to cancer is well-known, the environmental
causes are less so, although with the help of organizations such
as the HBCAC the general public is becoming more aware of common
environmental dangers. Today, with reports left and right about
various cancer-causing agents, it is difficult to distinguish between
what is carcinogenic and what is not; if everything causes cancer,
then there must be no point in avoiding aspartame and French fries
if your tap water contains arsenic!
Prevention then becomes a moot point. My summer at Fox Chase Cancer
Center taught me differently. Seeing first-hand exactly what a relatively
“normal” dose of TCDD, one of the most toxic compounds
known to mankind, can do to a normal mammary gland has certainly
changed my mind about environmental factors and cancer. Not only
were the mammary glands visibly less mature, but the structures
which can predispose a mammary gland to cancer were twice as numerous
in those exposed to TCDD.
Dioxins, or the family of compounds that TCDD belongs to, are
by-products of inefficient waste incineration and fuel combustion.
That means that devising an economical way to burn your garbage,
or even inventing a filter, could potentially reduce your risk of
getting cancer by countless factors. That means that by preventing
certain items from being produced in a certain manner, and by simply
disposing of waste properly, we could do something as drastic as
save lives. It is a much better way to spend your money preventing
disease rather than trying to treat it once it happens. We could
save not only countless lives, but years of suffering, a lot of
money, and a lot of grief.
I learned from my research at Fox Chase that people, instead of
being intimidated into inactivity by the sheer amounts of toxins
in our system, should be brought to the light about not only environmental
factors, but ways to prevent horrible disasters like Love Canal.
I have concluded from my experience at Fox Chase that one, environmental
research is ineffably crucial to our understanding of the development
of traumatic and terminal diseases such as cancer, two, that your
results are very rarely what you expected, which really does make
all the difference, and three, that discussing your results during
tea time can sometimes invoke odd glances in your direction.
The Students and Scientists Research Scholarship Program indeed
changed my outlook in the field of cancer study. I walked into Fox
Chase Cancer Center expecting another study on just another compound
that causes cancer; I walked out four weeks later having learned
a life-long lesson in making assumptions. It is absolutely mind-blowing
once you think about it, but we can do something about cancer. We
can prevent it; we can stop it.
“Cancer is a word, not a sentence. ~John Diamond”
Zach Rotter
This past summer, I had the wonderful opportunity to conduct cutting
edge Breast Cancer research at Fox Chase Cancer Center. During my
experience, I had unmatchable learning experiences, surprising findings,
and great memories.
My internship at Fox Chase Cancer Ctr. involved researching the
effect of Bisphenol-A (BPA) on rat mammary gland morphology and
gene expression. The research involved counting the amount of Terminal
End Bud’s (TEB’s) in various rat mammary glands, because
TEB’s are a target of carcinogenesis. In other words, if there
are a high number of TEB’s in one Rat’s mammary gland
compared to another, said rat likely has an increased chance of
developing cancer. In terms of BPA, I found no significant difference
in TEB count with mammary glands containing BPA as compared to control
glands. However, possibly the most important find I discovered occurred
during the gene expression analysis (GEA).
While analyzing the GEA, a specific set of three genes were found,
all of which are closely related to inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).
Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and extremely virulent form
of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 5% of all breast
cancer cases in the US each year. It is characterized by hot, swollen
legions on and around the breast, and often times goes misdiagnosed.
The discovery of a possible link between IBC and BPA is important,
as little is known about the causes of IBC.
Opposite the research, I was placed into a host family’s
house, which I am grateful for, as the home stay was a wonderful
experience. I was welcomed into the family, and was able to participate
in all of their activities which I enjoy at home, such as soccer
and tennis. In addition, I was able to eat my first Philly cheese
steak, a taste that I will not soon forget.
I would like to thank HBCAC for this wonderful opportunity, and
to thank the Rubin’s for welcoming me into their home and
family.
|
Students and Scientists
2008 interns meet to recap their experience at Fox Chase Cancer
Ctr., Philadelphia. Show here – Shirou Wu, Emily Lopes,
Tehreem Rehman (2007 intern), Zach Rotter (low middle) with
Richard Kurtz (rear middle), Commack HS science teacher, Lisa
Kratter, HBCAC program coordinator, and Amy Oldenborg, Walt
Whitman HS science teacher.
|
|